World Health Organisation fails at science and fails at propaganda – the sad case of WHO’s anti-vaping Q&A
On 20 January 2020, the World Health Organisation published a question and answer page on “ENDS” (Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems) …
On 20 January 2020, the World Health Organisation published a question and answer page on “ENDS” (Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems) …
I did a Twitter chat with the Campaign for Safer Alternatives on the typical objections raised to tobacco harm reduction. …
Twitter Q&A: debunking tobacco harm reduction misconceptions Read More
The enemies of innovation are on manoeuvres This week there will be a meeting of tobacco regulators under auspices of …
I am proud to be a co-author of a commentary published today in The Lancet: Nicotine without smoke: fighting the …
Every two years, the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control meet to discuss how to advance the …
We’ve sent a letter to WHO and the FCTC secretariat in advance of FCTC COP-8 (1-6 October, Geneva) – protesting …
Letter to WHO’s DG against prohibition and for risk-proportionate regulation Read More
Updated 9 November with UKCTAS report translations The UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies (UKCTAS) has produced a devastating critique …
WHO’s anti-vaping scientific castle of cards toppled Read More
I’m sometimes accused of being a WHO-sceptic, or worse. No more! In the run up to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control …
WHO tobacco meeting – could the FCTC do something useful on vaping? Read More
Most international treaties welcome observers and diversity of opinion. Not the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which has its …
First build your echo chamber – how WHO excludes dissent and diversity Read More
The World Health Organisation does a good line in war-like rhetoric when it comes to tobacco policy. But what is …
Who or what is the World Health Organisation at war with? Read More